Menu
Archived articles from 2005
34 articles found
Non-signatories and arbitration of personal injury claims
By Rob Hargrove - October 31, 2005
On Friday, the Texas Supreme Court handed down an opinion granting Petition for Writ of Mandamus compelling a non-signatory to an arbitration clause to arbitrate personal injury claims the Court itself admits do not stem from the contract which contains the arbitration clause. The plaintiff in the underlying case asserted personal injury claims against a home builder, claiming that she developed asthma from the dust created by the home builder
Thursday, October 20, 2005
By Rob Hargrove - October 20, 2005
This morning, the Third Court of Appeals issued an opinion in an appeal by the Bexar Metropolitan Water District of a decision by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to approve the City of Bulverde’s application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity for water utility service. In this case, the administrative law judge recommended against the certificate, but the commission disagreed and granted the certificate, the
Medical Privileges in Texas
By Rob Hargrove - October 14, 2005
Today, the Texas Supreme Court handed down an opinion granting a petition for writ of mandamus pertaining to a nursing home’s claim that certain documents were privileged from discovery based on four distinct asserted privileges: the medical committee privilege; the medical peer review committee privilege; the nursing peer review committee privilege; and the quality assessment and assurance privilege. The Court grants the petition for writ
When is a Premises Claim a Medical Negligence Claim?
By Rob Hargrove - October 14, 2005
Today, the Texas Supreme Court handed down an opinion reversing a decision by the Dallas Court of Appeals which in turn had reversed a trial court’s dismissal of a nursing home resident’s claims on limitations grounds. In the underlying case, the resident alleged that she was sexually assaulted in a nursing home and asserted what she characterized as premises liability claims against the home. The claims were more than five years old
Reverse Pre-Emption of the FAA!
By Rob Hargrove - October 14, 2005
This morning, the Texas Supreme Court made vague reference to the possibility that the Federal Arbitration Act can be reverse pre-empted by the McCarran-Ferguson Act. Since this is the sort of thing we find fascinating, I poked around a bit. As readers of this blog know, certain language (in 10-point boldface type no less) must be present in any arbitration agreement that would require a patient or prospective patient to arbitrate a medical liabi
Thursday, October 13, 2005
By Rob Hargrove - October 13, 2005
This morning, the Third Court of Appeals affirmed a Travis County Trial Court’s granting of a no-evidence motion for summary judgment in favor of a hospital in a medical malpractice case. According to the Court, where a medical malpractice plaintiff filed a proper expert report under the former article 4590i but failed to designate any expert in response to a Request for Disclosure by the Level 3 Discovery Plan designation deadline, the Def
Thursday, October 6, 2005
By Rob Hargrove - October 6, 2005
This morning, the Third Court of Appeals issued three memorandum opinions. The first concerns a juvenile adjudication for the offense of assault, and the second affirms a decision by the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners to revoke a physician’s license to practice medicine in Texas. Cause Nos. 03-04-00001-CV and 03-04-00612-CV, respectively. The Court’s third memorandum opinion, in an interlocutory appeal, reverses a Trial Court&
YOU CANNOT WAIVE THE OFFENDING ARBITRATION PROVISION
By Rick Freeman - October 4, 2005
Rick Freeman Commentary One argument that is regularly made by lawyers who are attempting to compel arbitration is to ask the Court to reform the arbitration clause in some way, if the Court feels that the arbitration clause is so unfair or one-sided that it could be unconscionable. This is generally a difficult argument to rebut if you are the lawyer arguing the effect of the unfairness or one-sidedness of an arbitration provision. You argue: Ju
Friday, September 30, 2005
By Rob Hargrove - September 30, 2005
Today, the Texas Supreme Court handed down an opinion on three certified questions from the Fifth Circuit which construes Section 5.077 of the Texas Property Code, which deals with accounting requirements the Code places on sellers of real property pursuant to executory contracts. Justice Medina wrote for the six-Justice majority, Justice Wainright wrote a concurring opinion, and three Justices dissented. Section 5.077(a) of the Property Code req
High Costs of Arbitration
By Rick Freeman - September 29, 2005
Rick Freeman Commentary Following up on my article last week regarding the Olshan case – in which the San Antonio Court of Appeals found that the high cost of the required arbitration to be “shocking” and unconscionable and therefore the arbitration provision was unenforceable – I want to examine two appellate cases decided in 2004 that discuss substantive unconscionablity. In the first case, Pine Ridge Homes, Inc. v. Ston
Legal Research
Recent Posts
Search
Legal Research
© 2026, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy