• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Texas Supreme Court Holds FAA Preempts Texas Law in Nursing Home Dispute

0
by Beth Graham

Tuesday, Mar 10, 2015


Tweet

On Friday, the Supreme Court of Texas ruled that Section 74.451 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code was preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). In Fredricksburg Care Co., L.P. v. Perez, No. 13-0573 (March 6, 2015), a Texas nursing home sought review by the Texas high court after the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio denied its motion to compel arbitration in a wrongful death lawsuit that was filed against the facility. The issue presented in the case was:

The Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws which restrict arbitration agreements. The McCarran-Ferguson Act protects state insurance regulations from unintended federal law preemption. Is Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Section 74.451—which restricts arbitration between healthcare providers and patients—an insurance regulation?

Although an arbitral agreement the nursing home entered into with the decedent did not comply with the requirements of the Texas Medical Liability Act, the facility claimed the state law was preempted and the dispute was subject to arbitration under the FAA. The deceased woman’s family countered that the Texas law is an insurance statute that is protected from preemption by the McCarran-Ferguson Act (“MFA”).

After reviewing the legislative purpose behind Section 74.451, the Texas Supreme Court found that the law was not an insurance regulation. According to the court, Section 74.451 was not “aimed at protecting or regulating the performance of a contract of insurance—either between the health care provider and its malpractice insurer, or the patient and its insurer.” Instead, the court stated Section 74.451 was created to govern the relationship between medical providers and patients. Because the MFA did not save Section 74.451, the Supreme Court of Texas held that the law was preempted by the FAA and reversed the San Antonio court’s order denying the nursing home’s motion to compel arbitration.

Photo credit: Wiertz Sébastien / Foter / CC BY

Related Posts

  • Texas Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument Over Possible FAA Preemption in Nursing Home CaseTexas Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument Over Possible FAA Preemption in Nursing Home Case
  • Federally Funded Nursing Homes No Longer Allowed to Require Residents to Sign Binding Arbitration AgreementsFederally Funded Nursing Homes No Longer Allowed to Require Residents to Sign Binding Arbitration Agreements
  • U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Review Challenge to Texas High Court’s Order in Nursing Home DisputeU.S. Supreme Court Declines to Review Challenge to Texas High Court’s Order in Nursing Home Dispute
  • San Antonio COA Refuses to Compel Nursing Home Negligence Case to ArbitrationSan Antonio COA Refuses to Compel Nursing Home Negligence Case to Arbitration
  • SCOTX Will Not Consider Whether Arbitrator Exceeded Authority in Workplace Discrimination CaseSCOTX Will Not Consider Whether Arbitrator Exceeded Authority in Workplace Discrimination Case
  • SCOTX Holds Payday Lender Did Not Waive Right to ArbitrationSCOTX Holds Payday Lender Did Not Waive Right to Arbitration

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy