• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Texas Supreme Court Agrees to Consider Whether Arbitral Agreement in Cotton Dispute is Unconscionable

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Dec 16, 2013


Tweet

On November 22, the Supreme Court of Texas agreed to hear Venture Cotton Cooperative et al. v. Freeman et al., No. 13-0122.  The case is currently on appeal from Texas’ 11th Court of Appeals.  The main issue in the dispute is whether an arbitration agreement is unconscionable where the terms of a contract state that one party is allowed to collect attorney’s fees following a breach, but the other is not.  Both the trial court and the 11th COA held the provision rendered the agreement substantively unconscionable.  Additionally, the appeals court ruled that the unconscionable clause should not be severed from the remainder of the contract due to Venture Cotton’s apparent waiver.  The case is set for oral argument on January 9, 2014.

Please stay tuned to Disputing for future posts on this interesting case!

Related Posts

  • Texas Supreme Court Holds Agreement to Arbitrate is Not Substantively Unconscionable Despite Unenforceable ProvisionsTexas Supreme Court Holds Agreement to Arbitrate is Not Substantively Unconscionable Despite Unenforceable Provisions
  • Houston COA Orders Arbitration After Man Ratifies Procedurally Unconscionable AgreementHouston COA Orders Arbitration After Man Ratifies Procedurally Unconscionable Agreement
  • Texas Supreme Court Overturns $26 Million Arbitral Award Over Improper Arbitrator DisqualificationTexas Supreme Court Overturns $26 Million Arbitral Award Over Improper Arbitrator Disqualification
  • Texas Supreme Court Holds Arbitrator’s Partial Disclosure of Information Supports Finding of Evident PartialityTexas Supreme Court Holds Arbitrator’s Partial Disclosure of Information Supports Finding of Evident Partiality
  • Texas Supreme Court Agrees to Consider What Constitutes Arbitrator Evident PartialityTexas Supreme Court Agrees to Consider What Constitutes Arbitrator Evident Partiality
  • Texas Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case Involving Arbitrator DisqualificationTexas Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case Involving Arbitrator Disqualification

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy