• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


SCOTUS Finally Agrees to Consider Whether Class Action Waivers Included in Employment Agreements Violate the NLRA

0
by Beth Graham

Friday, Jan 13, 2017


Tweet

The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in three cases related to the legality of class action waivers included in an employer’s arbitration agreement.  In its order granting certiorari, the court stated the cases would be consolidated “and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.”

The cases are:

No. 16-285 ) EPIC SYSTEMS CORP. V. LEWIS, JACOB

No. 16-300 ) ERNST & YOUNG, ET AL. V. MORRIS, STEPHEN, ET AL.

No. 16-307 ) NLRB V. MURPHY OIL USA, INC., ET AL.

The cases being considered by the nation’s highest court were decided by the Seventh, Ninth, and Fifth Circuits.  Previously, the Seventh and Ninth Circuits both sided with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) and held that a collective action ban included in an employment contract violates the National Labor Relations Act.  In contrast, the Fifth Circuit rejected the NLRB’s efforts to ban class action arbitration waivers in Murphy Oil.  The case is not the first time the NLRB and the Fifth Circuit have found themselves at odds over the issue in recent years.

Please check back soon for more on this exciting development!

Photo credit: ThatMattWade via Foter.com / CC BY-SA

Related Posts

  • SCOTUS to Consider Murphy Oil, Epic Systems, and Ernst & Young TodaySCOTUS to Consider Murphy Oil, Epic Systems, and Ernst & Young Today
  • 5th Circuit Upholds Class Waiver Without an Arbitration Agreement5th Circuit Upholds Class Waiver Without an Arbitration Agreement
  • SCOTUS to Hear Oral Argument in Murphy Oil on October 2ndSCOTUS to Hear Oral Argument in Murphy Oil on October 2nd
  • DOJ Flips on Class Waivers IssueDOJ Flips on Class Waivers Issue
  • NLRB Judge Rules Houston-Based Restaurant Chain’s Collective Action Ban Violates NLRANLRB Judge Rules Houston-Based Restaurant Chain’s Collective Action Ban Violates NLRA
  • Fifth Circuit Adheres to D.R. Horton, Upholds Class Arbitration Waiver in Employment DisputeFifth Circuit Adheres to D.R. Horton, Upholds Class Arbitration Waiver in Employment Dispute

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy