University of Kansas School of Law Professor Stephen J. Ware has published “Private Ordering and Commercial Arbitration: Lasting Lessons from Mentschikoff,” Journal of Dispute Resolution, Vol. 2019, No. 1, 2019. In his essay, Professor Ware reexamines Soia Mentschikoff’s 1961 journal article titled “Commercial Arbitration,” while taking into account “contemporary scholarship on private ordering.”
The abstract states:
“Private ordering” is an important concept and commonly-used phrase in legal scholarship. At least three “ordering” activities often performed by governments can be privatized: lawmaking, adjudication, and enforcement of adjudicators’ decisions. Distinguishing among these activities and offering lasting lessons on their privatization — but nowadays not often credited for doing so — is Soia Mentschikoff’s seminal 1961 article, Commercial Arbitration. This short piece reconsiders Mentschikoff’s classic article in light of contemporary scholarship on private ordering and credits Commercial Arbitration with teaching us lasting lessons about commercial arbitration and even about commerce itself. Key to these lessons is Mentschikoff’s empirical study of trade association arbitration and her comparison of such industry-specific arbitration with the more general commercial arbitration exemplified by the American Arbitration Association (AAA). This comparison shows arbitration’s ability — especially in the “core commercial” context of trade associations — to privatize all three of the aforementioned “ordering” activities: lawmaking, adjudication, and enforcement of adjudicators’ decisions. Mentschikoff thus builds impressively from the humble context of routine sales disputes to enduring insights about the role of private ordering in the production, application, and enforcement of law.