• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (312) 705-9317

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Mediators in Arbitration

0
by Beth Graham

Tuesday, Oct 22, 2019


Tweet

Fordham University School of Law Professor Jacqueline M. Nolan-Haley has published, “Mediators in Arbitration,” Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration, Chapter 14, (Thomas Schultz and Federico Ortino Editors). Oxford University Press 2020, Forthcoming; Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3467670.  In her book chapter, Professor Nolan-Haley examines the role of mediation in today’s transnational dispute system with a special focus on the convergence of arbitration and mediation.

Here is the abstract:

This Chapter focuses on mediation in practice and describes mediation’s role in contemporary transnational dispute system design. It acknowledges the general trend towards settlement facilitation in international arbitration and focuses on mediators giving shape and structure to that facilitation. It examines the mediation process, its advantages, commonalities with and differences from arbitration and the growth of transnational mediation practice. Reflection on the relationship between mediation and justice, equity and fairness, summons up several models of mediator behavior that seek to achieve justice. Special attention is paid to contemporary convergences with arbitration and mediation and the controversial mixture of arbitration and mediation — mediation processes that include aspects of mediation within arbitration and arbitration within mediation. Finally, it offers some cautionary considerations on blending mediation and arbitration and proposes several questions for reflection about the way forward.

This and other publications written by Professor Nolan-Haley may be downloaded free of charge from the Social Science Research Network.

Photo by: Ben White on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • Fifth Circuit Rules that the Arbitrators -Not the Courts- Must Decide Who Pays the AAA Arbitration FeesFifth Circuit Rules that the Arbitrators -Not the Courts- Must Decide Who Pays the AAA Arbitration Fees
  • The Impending Battle for the Soul of Online Dispute ResolutionThe Impending Battle for the Soul of Online Dispute Resolution
  • Challenging an Arbitral Award in the CBA contextChallenging an Arbitral Award in the CBA context
  • 2009 Developments in Mediation:  Foreclosure Mediation Programs2009 Developments in Mediation: Foreclosure Mediation Programs
  • AAA and CPR Issue Remote Arbitration Hearing GuidanceAAA and CPR Issue Remote Arbitration Hearing Guidance
  • More Texas Bloggers Discuss ArbitrabilityMore Texas Bloggers Discuss Arbitrability

Like this article? Share it!


  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2026, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy