• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


California Federal Judge Issues Preliminary Injunction Against Enforcement of AB 51

0
by Beth Graham

Tuesday, Feb 11, 2020


Tweet

A California federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against a new state law that would prohibit employers from requiring workers to sign a mandatory arbitration provision as a condition of employment.  In Chamber of Commerce of the USA et al. v. Becerra et al., No. 2:19-cv-02456, a group of plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Eastern District of California asking the court to declare California’s AB 51 preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.  As discussed in an earlier Disputing blog post:

AB 51 mandates that an “employer shall not threaten, retaliate or discriminate against, or terminate any applicant for employment or any employee because of the refusal to consent to the waiver of any right, forum, or procedure for a violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act or this code, including the right to file and pursue a civil action or a complaint with, or otherwise notify, any state agency, other public prosecutor, law enforcement agency, or any court or other governmental entity of any alleged violation.”  AB 51 “does not apply to a person registered with a self-regulatory organization as defined by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Sec. 78c) or regulations adopted under that act pertaining to any requirement of a self-regulatory organization that a person arbitrate disputes that arise between the person and their employer or any other person as specified by the rules of the self-regulatory organization.”

According to the text of AB 51, the law is not “intended to invalidate a written arbitration agreement that is otherwise enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. Sec. 1 et seq.).” In 2018, however, a nearly identical bill, AB 3080, was vetoed by California’s previous governor due to the likely preemptive effect of the Federal Arbitration Act.

Although AB 51 was originally set to take effect on January 1st, Chief United States District Judge Kimberly Mueller issued a temporary restraining order barring its enforcement in late 2019.  In a 36-page order that was filed on Friday, Judge Mueller enjoined enforcement of the law and ruled “AB 51 is pre-empted by the FAA because it singles out arbitration by placing uncommon barriers on employers who require contractual waivers of dispute resolution options that bear the defining features of arbitration.”

The entire order in is available for viewing on the Courthouse News Service website.

Photo by: Bill Oxford on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • Southern District of New York Holds that Arbitrators Did Not Manifestly Disregard the LawSouthern District of New York Holds that Arbitrators Did Not Manifestly Disregard the Law
  • CalOHII Publishes Electronic HIE Demonstration Projects RegulationsCalOHII Publishes Electronic HIE Demonstration Projects Regulations
  • Second Circuit Rules on the Meaning of ‘Customer’ Under FINRASecond Circuit Rules on the Meaning of ‘Customer’ Under FINRA
  • El Paso COA Affirms Order Denying Arbitration in Discrimination and Retaliation CaseEl Paso COA Affirms Order Denying Arbitration in Discrimination and Retaliation Case
  • SCOTUS Holds FAA’s Transportation Worker Exception Applies to Independent ContractorsSCOTUS Holds FAA’s Transportation Worker Exception Applies to Independent Contractors
  • Consistently Inconsistent: The Need for Predictability in Awarding Costs and Fees in Investment Treaty ArbitrationsConsistently Inconsistent: The Need for Predictability in Awarding Costs and Fees in Investment Treaty Arbitrations

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy