• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


A Summary of Recent Arbitration Confirmation Cases

0
by Beth Graham

Thursday, Aug 01, 2013


Tweet

Roland Goss, Partner at Jordon Burt, LLP, has compiled a useful summary of recent arbitration confirmation cases.  Disputing would like to thank Mr. Goss for allowing us to share his summary here:

Disagreement Over Result

Bailey Brake Farms, Inc. v. Trout, No. 2011-CA-00610 (Miss. S.C. May 23, 2013) (mere disagreement with the result of arbitration is not a ground for vacating an arbitration award)

Leeward Constr. Co. v. American Univ. of Antigua College of Medicine, Case No. 12-6280 (USDC S.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2013) (mere disagreement with the result of arbitration is not a ground for vacating an arbitration award)

Evident Partiality

Bain Cotton Co. v. Chestnutt Cotton Co., No. 12-11138 (5th Cir. June 24, 2013) (denial of discovery by arbitrator did not amount to evident partiality)

Antietam Industries, Inc. v. Morgan & Keegan Co., Case No. 12-1250 (USDC M.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2013) (lack of disclosure by arbitrator did not amount to evident partiality, nor was arbitrator misbehavior or exceeding powers demonstrated)

Exceeding Authority

Donnelly v. Jewel of Kahana, LLC, Case No. 12-00347 (USDC D. Ha. Mar. 28, 2013) (using the completely irrational test, the arbitrator did not act in excess of authority; improper arbitrator bias was not shown; mere disagreement with arbitration result is not a basis for vacating an award)

E*Trade Securities, LLC v. Nash, Case No. 12-1766 (USDC M.D. FL. Mar. 12, 2013) (arbitrator did not exceed authority by deciding issue when the parties waived their right to have the issue determined by a court)

Jurisdiction

Liu v. Mar, Case No. 13-685 (USDC N.D. Ill. April 10, 2013) (motion to confirm arbitration award dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because no basis for federal jurisdiction was articulated other than the Federal Arbitration Act, which does not provide a basis for the exercise of jurisdiction)

Manifest Disregard

Bartlett Grain Co. v. Sunburst Farms Partnership, Case No. 13-1152 (USDC D. Ks. July 5, 2013) (avoids question of whether the doctrine of manifest disregard of law survives Supreme Court’s Hall Street Associates opinion by finding that manifest disregard was not demonstrated)

Stipulation

Berkley Ins. Co. v. Excalibur Reinsur. Corp., Case No. 13-2633 (USDC S.D. N.Y. May 15, 2013) (arbitration award concerning reinsurance dispute confirmed by stipulation)

Untimely Request to Vacate

Glaser v. Legg, Case No. 12-805 (USDC D. D.C. Mar. 11, 2013) (petition to vacate arbitration award denied as untimely under the Federal Arbitration Act; Petitioner barred from raising arguments in support of vacating award as affirmative defenses to cross-petition to confirm the award)

Related Posts

  • Seventh Circuit Rules that ‘Manifest Disregard of the Law’ Is Not Independent Basis for Vacating Arbitral AwardsSeventh Circuit Rules that ‘Manifest Disregard of the Law’ Is Not Independent Basis for Vacating Arbitral Awards
  • Article | Are Arbitrators Above the Law? The ‘Manifest Disregard of the Law’ StandardArticle | Are Arbitrators Above the Law? The ‘Manifest Disregard of the Law’ Standard
  • Supreme Court Denies Cert in Manifest Disregard CaseSupreme Court Denies Cert in Manifest Disregard Case
  • Manifest Disregard Round-UpManifest Disregard Round-Up
  • Law Review Article | Alternative Dispute ResolutionLaw Review Article | Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Texas Bar Journal Article:  “What You Always Wanted to Know About Arbitration”Texas Bar Journal Article: “What You Always Wanted to Know About Arbitration”

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy